Skip to content

TPcases

Database of Transfer Pricing Case Laws

MENUMENU

Show more results
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Show more results
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Keywords
Countries
Countries
Guidelines
Case Laws
TP News

MENUMENU

Show more results
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Show more results
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Keywords
Countries
Countries
Guidelines
Case Laws
TP News

§ 1.482-2(c) Use of tangible property –

Posted on September 10, 2022 | By Internal Revenue Service

Category: US IRC Section 482 on Transfer Pricing, § 1.482-2 Determination of taxable income in specific situations. | Tag: Leased business assets, Leasing, Tangible Property

« Prev | Next »

Related Guidelines

Related Case Laws

Malaysia vs Ensco Gerudi Malaysia SDN. BHD., July 2021, Juridical Review, High Court, Case No. WA-25-233-08-2020Ensco Gerudi provided offshore drilling services to the petroleum industry in Malaysia, including leasing drilling rigs, to oil and gas operators in Malaysia. In order to provide these services, the Ensco entered into a Master Charter Agreement dated 21.9.2006 (amended on 17.8.2011) (“Master Charter Agreement”) with Ensco Labuan Limited (“ELL”),...

Romania vs “Machinery rental” S.C. A. SRL, September 2020, Supreme Court, Case No 4453/2020An assessment had been issued where the pricing of intra group rental expenses for machinery had been set aside by the tax authorities for FY 2010-2013. By an application filed with the Court of Appeal S.C. A. S.R.L. requested the Court for annulment of the assessment. The Court of Appeal...

Czech Republic vs. B.p., s.r.o., June 2007, Supreme Administrative Court , Case No 8 Afs 152/2005 – 72The subject-matter of the dispute was the exclusion of the rent for lease of machinery and equipment. It referred to the lease and sublease agreements for non-residential premises, machinery and equipment with the companies B.p., s.r.o. and M.-T., s.r.o., by which the parties agreed that the objects of the lease...

Peru vs. “TELE SA”, July 2020, Tax Court, Case No 03306-9-2020“TELE SA” had applied a 15% withholding tax rate to lease payments for telecommunications equipment purportedly provided by a Chilean company that had been established by the Mexican parent of the “TELE” group. TELE SA claimed the payments qualified as royalties under Article 12 of the Peru-Chile double tax treaty....

Poland vs “H-trademark S.A.”, February 2012, Administrative Court, Case No I SA/Po 827/11“H-trademark S.A.” applied for a ruling on the tax rules governing a business restructuring where trademarks were transferred to another group company and licensed back – whether Polish arm’s length provisions would apply to the transaction. The company was of the opinion that Polish arm’s length provision (article 11) would...

Italy vs GKN, October 2023, Supreme Court, No 29936/2023The tax authorities had notified the companies GKN Driveline Firenze s.p.a. and GKN Italia s.p.a. of four notices of assessment, relating to the tax periods from 2002 to 2005, as well as 2011. The assessments related to the signing of a leasing contract, concerning a real estate complex, between GKN...

Copyright 2024 TPcases