Countries: Japan

Japan vs Universal Music Corp, April 2022, Supreme Court, Case No 令和2(行ヒ)303

blank

An intercompany loan in the form of a so-called international debt pushdown had been issued to Universal Music Japan to acquire the shares of another Japanese group company. The tax authority found that the loan transaction had been entered for the principal purpose of reducing the tax burden in Japan and issued an assessment where […]

Japan vs. “Metal Plating Corp”, February 2020, Tokyo District Court, Case No 535 of Heisei 27 (2008)

blank

“Metal Plating Corp” is engaged in manufacturing and selling plating chemicals and had entered into a series of controlled transactions with foreign group companies granting licenses to use intangibles (know-how related to technology and sales) – and provided technical support services by sending over technical experts. The company had used a CUP method to price […]

Japan vs. Universal Music Corp, June 2019, Tokyo District Court, Case No å¹³æˆ27(行ウ)468

blank

An intercompany loan in the form of a so-called international debt pushdown had been issued to Universal Music Japan to acquire the shares of another Japanese group company. The tax authority found that the loan transaction had been entered for the principal purpose of reducing the tax burden in Japan and issued an assessment where […]

Japan vs Denso Singapore, November 2017, Supreme Court of Japan

blank

A tax assessment based on Japanese CFC rules (anti-tax haven rules) had been applied to a Japanese Group’s (Denso), subsidiary in Singapore. According to Japanese CFC rules, income arising from a foreign subsidiary located in a state or territory with significantly lower tax rates is deemed to arise as the income of the parent company when the principal business of […]

Japan vs C Uyemura & Co, Ltd, November 2017, Tokyo District Court, Case No. 267-141 (Order No. 13090)

blank

C Uyemura & Co, Ltd. is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling plating chemicals and had entered into a series of controlled transactions with foreign group companies granting licenses to use intangibles (know-how related to technology and sales) – and provided technical support services by sending over technical experts. The company had used […]

Japan vs. Publisher Corp, April 2017, Tokyo District Court, Case No 第267å·ï¼ï¼•6(順å·ï¼‘3ï¼ï¼ï¼•)

blank

A Japanese company entered into a transaction with a foreing group company to import English-language learning materials into Japan. The learning materials were then resold to Japanese customers. The Japanese tax authority found that the resale price method should be used for setting the arm’s-length price for the transaction. The arm’s-length price for the controlled […]

Japan vs “TH Corp”, January 2017, District Court, Case No. 56 of 2014 (Gyoseu)

blank

A tax assessment based on Japanese CFC rules (anti-tax haven rules) had been applied to a “TH Corp”‘s, subsidiary in Singapore. According to Japanese CFC rules, income arising from a foreign subsidiary located in a state or territory with significantly lower tax rates is deemed to arise as the income of the parent company when the principal business of the […]

Japan vs Honda Motor Company Limited, May 2015, Tokyo High Court judgment, Case No 13 May 2015 Heisei 26 gyou-ko No 347

blank

In the Tokyo High Court judgment, dated 13 May 2015, Honda Motor Company Limited, a major Japanese automobile manufacturer, obtained a cancellation of a tax assessment of Â¥25.4 billion. The court held that the tax authorities had erred in the selection of companies comparable to the tested party (Honda’s foreign subsidiary in Brazil). The tested party was […]

Japan vs. IBM, March 2015, Tokyo High Court, Case no 第265å·ï¼ï¼•6(順å·ï¼‘2639)

blank

An intermediate Japanese holding company in the IBM group acquired from its US parent all of the shares of a Japanese operating company. The Japanese holdings company then sold a portions of shares in the operating company back to the issuing company for the purpose of repatriation of earned profits. These sales resulted in losses […]

Japan vs Manufacturing Co. March 2013, Tokyo High Court, No 19

blank

A Japanese manufacturing company was issued an estimated tax assessment due to lack of transfer pricing documentation. The District Court ruled in favor of the tax authorities. The Court decided that accounts and documents necessary for calculating arms’s length prices should be presented or submitted to the tax authorities without delay. If sufficient documentation is […]

Japan vs Imabari Shipbuilding Co. Ltd., October 2006, Takamatsu High Court, Case No. 17

blank

Imabari Shipbuilding Co.Ltd., was a Japanese shipbuilding company constructing ships for an affiliate company located in Panama, Panama S.A. The Japanese tax authorities found that prices used in transactions between Imabari Co. and Panama S.A. had not been at arm’s length. A tax assessment was therefore issued where the pricing was based on the comparable […]