Germany vs “Clothing Distribution Gmbh”, October 2001, BFH Urt. 17.10.2001, IR 103/00

« | »

A German GmbH distributed clothing for its Italian parent. The German tax authorities issued a tax assessment based on hidden profit distribution from the German GmbH in favor of its Italien parent as a result of excessive purchase prices, which led to high and continuous losses in Germany. 

The tax authorities determined the arm’s length price based on purchase prices, which the German GmbH had paid to external suppliers. However, these purchases accounted for only 5% of the turnover.

The German Tax Court affirmed in substance a vGA (hidden profit distribution) as the tax authorities had provided no proff of deviation from arm’s length prices.

If a hidden profit distribution is to be accepted, the profit shall be increased by the difference between the actually agreed price and the price agreed by independent contractual parties under similar circumstances – the arm’s length price. Where a range of arm’s length prices is produced, there are no legal basis for adjustment to the median value. The assessment must instead be based on the best value for the taxpayer.

Distributors incurring losses for more than three years:

The Senate understands its ruling in BFHE 170, 550, BStBl II 1993, 457 to say that whenever a distribution company sells products of an affiliate company and suffers significant losses for more than three years, a rebuttable presumption is triggered that the agreed transfer price has not been at arm’s length.

The assumption of a rebuttable presumption means that the taxpayer can explain and prove why the actually agreed transfer price is nevertheless appropriate. This applies if the articles purchased exceeds 95% of the total turnover. The taxpayer may, For example, explain why the actual development is either due to mismanagement or other reasons that were not foreseen and, above all, that timely adaptation measures have been taken.

Losses can be accepted over a period of more than three years if the corresponding proof is provided. It may be necessary to extend the period within which profit must be achieved. If proof is not provided and the taxpayer does not take any adaptive measures, a reasonable profit can be estimated and spread over the years.

 

Click here for English translation

Click here for other translation

 

I R 103-00

Related Guidelines