Germany vs Cyprus Ltd, June 2018, BFH judgment Case No IR 94/15

« | »

The Bundesfinanzhof confirmed prior case law according to which the provisions on hidden deposits and hidden profit distributions must be observed in the context of the additional taxation.

On the question of economic activity of the controlled foreign company, the Bundesfinanzhof refers to the ruling of the European Court of Justice concerning Cadbury-Schweppes from 2006.

According to paragraphs §§ 7 to 14 in the Außensteuergesetz (AStG) profits from controlled foreign companies without business activity can be taxed in Germany.

In the case at hand the subsidiary was located in a rented office in Cyprus and employed a resident managing director. Her job was to handle correspondence with clients, to carry out and supervise payment transactions, manage business records and keep records. She was also entrusted with obtaining book licenses to order these sub-licenses for the benefit of three of Russia’s and Ukraine’s affiliates, which distributed the books in the Russian-speaking market. The license income earned by subsidiary was taxed at 10 percent in Cyprus.

The Income was considered ‘passive’ as the subsidiary lacked the necessary ‘actual economic activity’.

On that basis the Bundesfinanzhof rejected the appeal of the taxpayer.

Click here for English translation

Click here for other translation

Bundesfinanzhof I R 94-15

Related Guidelines

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *