Norway vs Cytec, March 2019, Borgarting Lagmannsrett, Case No 2017-90184

Posted on | By Courts of Norway | No comments
Category: Business Restructuring, Intangibles - Goodwill Know-how Patents, Valuation - DCF and CUT/CUPs | Tag: , , ,
« | »

The question in the case was whether Cytec Norway KS (now Allnex Norway A/S) had paid an arm’s length price for an intra-group transfer of intangible assets in 2010.

Cytec Norway KS had set the price for the accquired intangibles at NOK 210 million and calculated tax depreciations on that basis.

The Norwegian tax authorities found that no intangibles had actually been transferred.

The tax Appeals Committee determined that intangibles had been transferred but only at a total value of NOK 45 million.

The Court of appeal upheld the dicision of the Tax Appeals Committee, where the price for tax purposes was estimated at NOK 44.9 million.

 

Click here for translation

Norway vs Cytec 19 March 2019, Borgarting Lagmannsrett Case No 2017-90184

Related Guidelines

TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 23 83. Birincil acquires 100% of the equity interests in an independent enterprise, Company T for 100. Company T is a company that engages in research and development and has partially developed several promising technologies but has only minimal sales. The purchase price is justified primarily by the value of the...
TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 29 104. Pervichnyi is the parent of an MNE group organised and doing business in country X. Prior to Year 1, Pervichnyi developed patents and trademarks related to Product F. It manufactured Product F in country X and supplied the product to distribution affiliates throughout the world. For purposes of this...
TPG2022 Chapter VIII Annex example 4 17. Company A and Company B are members of an MNE group and decide to undertake the development of an intangible through a CCA. The intangible is anticipated to be highly profitable based on Company B’s existing intangibles, its track record and its experienced research and development staff. Company A...
TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 26 92. Osnovni is the parent company of an MNE Group engaged in the development and sale of software products. Osnovni acquires 100% of the equity interests in Company S, a publicly traded company organised in the same country as Osnovni, for a price equal to 160. At the time of...
TPG2022 Annex to OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines paragraph 1 In July 1995, the OECD Council approved for publication the Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations (“the Guidelines”), submitted by the Committee on Fiscal Affairs (“the Committee”). At the same time, the OECD Council endorsed the Committee’s recommendation that the Guidelines be reviewed and up-dated periodically as...
TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 16 54. Shuyona is the parent company of an MNE group. Shuyona is organised in and operates exclusively in Country X. The Shuyona group is involved in the production and sale of consumer goods. In order to maintain and, if possible, improve its market position, ongoing research is carried out by...
TPG2022 Chapter VI paragraph 6.128 In conducting a comparability analysis involving the transfer of intangibles or rights in intangibles, the existence of risks related to the likelihood of obtaining future economic benefits from the transferred intangibles must be considered, including the allocation of risk between the parties which should be analysed within the framework set...
TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 28 101. Company A is the Parent company of an MNE group with operations in country S. Company B is a member of the MNE group with operations in country T, and Company C is also a member of the MNE group with operations in country U. For valid business reasons...
TPG2022 Chapter II Annex II example 11 51.  The success of an electronics product is linked to the innovative technological design both of its electronic processes and of its major component. That component is designed and manufactured by associated company A; is transferred to associated company B which designs and manufactures the rest of the product; and is...
TPG2022 Chapter VI paragraph 6.13 The guidance contained in this chapter is intended to address transfer pricing matters exclusively. It is not intended to have relevance for other tax purposes. For example, the Commentary on Article 12 of the OECD Model Tax Convention contains a detailed discussion of the definition of royalties under that Article...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *