Romania vs “GAS distributor” SC A, December 2020, Court of Appeal, Case No 238/12.03.2020

Posted on | By Courts of Romania | No comments
Category: Benchmark, Range and Median, Commodity Transactions, Comparability Analysis, Losses that continue indefinitely, Transfer Pricing Documentation | Tag: , , , , , , ,
« | »

The disputed issue concerns the purchase prices of natural gas by SC A from an affiliated company SC B. By orders of the National Energy Regulatory Authority (NERA), the prices of supply of natural gas to domestic and non-domestic consumers were regulated and fixed, but not the price at which SC A purchased it from the SC B.

The tax authority issued an assessment where the price of the controlled gas transaction was determined by reference to profit level indicators of comparable businesses.

SC A brought the decision to the Romanian courts.

Judgement of the Court of Appeal

The appeal of SC A was dismissed and the assessment of the tax authorities upheld.

Excerpt
“In the present case, in order to adjust the expenses for the cost of the goods purchased from SC “B.” SRL, based on the level of the central market trend, the tax body used the information provided by the ORBIS and FISCNET applications. Following the comparative analysis of the information provided by the two IT applications, the tax body identified 22 potentially comparable companies in Romania, of which only one met the qualitative criteria, which is why it correctly moved to a higher search level, namely that of the European Union, identifying 6 companies that were comparable in terms of quantity and quality.
In this regard, it was noted that, according to Article 8 of OPANAF No 442/2016, transactions between related persons are considered to be carried out according to the market value principle if the financial indicator of the transaction/transaction value (margin/profit/price) falls within the range of comparison. The following provisions shall be respected in determining the comparator range:
1. the comparability analysis will consider territorial criteria in the following order: national, European Union, pan-European, international;
2. reasonable availability of data at the time of transfer pricing or at the time of their documentation, for which the taxpayer/payer being verified provides supporting documentation for the data used at the time of transfer pricing;
3. the margin of comparison is the range of price or margin/profit values for comparable transactions between independent comparable companies;
4. for the determination of outliers, the margin of comparison shall be divided into 4 segments. The maximum and minimum segments represent the extreme results. The range of comparison is the range of price or margin/output values for comparable transactions between independent comparators, after eliminating the extreme results from the margin of comparison;
5. the extreme results within the margin of comparison shall not be used in determining and calculating the estimate/adjustment;
6. if the median value cannot be identified (the median value is the value at the middle of the range of comparison), the arithmetic mean of the two middle values of the range of comparison shall be taken.
In so far as the tax authority complied with the legal procedure for estimating the purchase prices, as required by ANAF Order 442/2016, the appellant’s criticisms are unfounded, especially as they do not essentially concern the specific procedure carried out by the tax authority.
Consequently, the appellant’s criticisms, which relate to the ground for annulment relied on, are unfounded, which is why the appeal was dismissed as unfounded.”

Click here for English translation

Click here for other translation

Romania vs SC A Case no 238-12032021

Related Guidelines

TPG2022 Chapter III paragraph 3.63Extreme results might consist of losses or unusually high profits. Extreme results can affect the financial indicators that are looked at in the chosen method (e.g. the gross margin when applying a resale price, or a net profit indicator when applying a transactional net margin method). They can also affect...
TPG2022 Chapter II Annex II example 1474. Below are some illustrations of the effect of choosing a measure of profits to determine the relevant profits to be split when applying a transactional profit split Scenario 1 74. Assume A and B are two associated enterprises situated in two different tax jurisdictions. Both manufacture the same widgets...
TPG2022 Chapter II paragraph 2.64The transactional net margin method examines the net profit relative to an appropriate base (e.g. costs, sales, assets) that a taxpayer realises from a controlled transaction (or transactions that are appropriate to aggregate under the principles of paragraphs 3.9-3.12). Thus, a transactional net margin method operates in a manner similar...
TPG2022 Chapter I paragraph 1.40All methods that apply the arm’s length principle can be tied to the concept that independent enterprises consider the options realistically available to them and in comparing one option to another they consider any differences between the options that would significantly affect their value. For instance, before purchasing a product...
TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 2692. Osnovni is the parent company of an MNE Group engaged in the development and sale of software products. Osnovni acquires 100% of the equity interests in Company S, a publicly traded company organised in the same country as Osnovni, for a price equal to 160. At the time of...
TPG2022 Chapter II Annex II example 1151.  The success of an electronics product is linked to the innovative technological design both of its electronic processes and of its major component. That component is designed and manufactured by associated company A; is transferred to associated company B which designs and manufactures the rest of the product; and is...
TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 926. The facts in this example are the same as in Example 8, except as follows: Under the contract between Primair and Company S, Company S is now obligated to develop and execute the marketing plan for country Y without detailed control of specific elements of the plan by Primair....
TPG2022 Chapter II paragraph 2.76The use of net profit indicators can potentially introduce a greater element of volatility into the determination of transfer prices for two reasons. First, net profit indicators can be influenced by some factors that do not have an effect (or have a less substantial or direct effect) on gross margins...
TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 1030. The facts in this example are the same as in Example 9, except that the market development functions undertaken by Company S in this Example 10 are far more extensive than those undertaken by Company S in Example 9. 31. Where the marketer/distributor actually bears the costs and assumes...
TPG2022 Chapter II paragraph 2.79It might be argued that the potential inaccuracies resulting from the above types of factors can be reflected in the size of the arm’s length range. The use of a range may to some extent mitigate the level of inaccuracy, but may not account for situations where a taxpayer’s profits...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *