Russia vs RIF Trading House, April 2019, Moscow City Court, Case No. No. A40-241020/18

Posted on | By Courts of Russia | No comments
Category: Commodity Transactions, Comparability Analysis, Sales and Marketing Hubs, Transfer Pricing Methods | Tag: , , , , , ,
« | »

In 2014, RIF Trading House sourced and bought agricultural products in Russia – wheat, barley, corn and peas. These products were then exported to a trader in the UAE, which turned out to be related to RIF Trading House.

However, RIF Trading House had not provide information on the relationship, nor the required transfer pricing documentation on the controlled transactions.

Following an audit, the Russian Federal Tax Service came to the conclusion that the export prices had been lowered in the supply of products to the trader in UAE.

The Russian Federal Tax Service independently conducted a transfer pricing analysis – functional analysis, analyzed the market, commodity exchange prices (Platts, ICAR) etc., and then issued a tax assessment where combinations of pricing methods and adjustments had been applied to determine the pricing of the controlled transactions and thus the income of RIF Trading House.

Disagreeing with the assessment RIF Trading House brought the case to Court.

The court ruled in favor of the tax authorities.

Click here for translation

A40-241020-2018_20190417_Reshenija_i_postanovlenija

Related Guidelines

TPG2022 Chapter II Annex I paragraph 1[See Chapter II, Part III, Section B of these Guidelines for general guidance on the application of the transactional net margin method. The assumptions about arm’s length arrangements in the following examples are intended for illustrative purposes only and should not be taken as prescribing adjustments and arm’s length arrangements...
TPG2022 Chapter VIII Annex example 1a8. The facts are the same as Example 1. In accordance with the guidance in paragraph 8.27, an alternative way to achieve the identical result under Example 1 is through the use of a two-step process as set out below 9. Step 1 (contributions measured at cost): Company A should...
TPG2022 Chapter IV Annex II paragraph 1Advance Pricing Arrangements (“APAs”) are the subject of extensive discussion in the Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations at Chapter IV, Section F. The development of working arrangements between competent authorities is considered at paragraph 4.175: Between those countries that use APAs, greater uniformity in APA practices...
TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 2797. Company A is the Parent of an MNE group with operations in country X. Company A owns patents, trademarks and know-how with regard to several products produced and sold by the MNE group. Company B is a wholly owned subsidiary of Company A. All of Company B’s operations are...
TPG2022 Chapter VII paragraph 7.3Intra-group arrangements for rendering services are sometimes linked to arrangements for transferring goods or intangibles (or the licensing thereof). In some cases, such as know-how contracts containing a service element, it may be very difficult to determine where the exact border lies between the transfer of intangibles or rights in...
TPG2022 Chapter II Annex II example 416. The facts in this example are the same as in Example 3, except that the marketing activities performed by Company B are more limited and do not significantly enhance the goodwill or reputation associated with the trademark. Company B has a mechanism whereby customer feedback on the products it...
TPG2022 Chapter II Annex II example 1365. Company A, resident in Country A, is the parent company of Retail Group, an MNE group engaged in the retail fashion industry. Over the years, Company A has developed know-how and has enhanced the value of the trademark and associated goodwill of its business through intensive marketing activities. In...
TPG2022 Chapter VIII Annex example 315. The facts are the same as Example 1, except that the per-unit value of Service 2 is 120 (that is, both Service 1 and Service 2 are equally valuable, and neither are low-value services).     16. Under the CCA, the value of Company A and Company B’s contributions...
TPG2022 Chapter IV Annex II paragraph 40The taxpayer should include a discussion of the availability and use of comparable pricing information. This would include a description of how the search for comparables was carried out (including search criteria employed), what data relating to uncontrolled transactions was obtained and how such data was accepted or rejected as...
OECD COVID-19 TPG paragraph 10The challenges associated with performing a comparability analysis may vary depending on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economically relevant characteristics of the accurately delineated transaction. For example, if a controlled transaction is covered by a pre-existing intercompany agreement (for example, if in 2018 it was determined that...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *