Tag: Classification of intangibles

Israel vs Sephira & Offek Ltd and Israel Daniel Amram, August 2021, Jerusalem District Court, Case No 2995-03-17
/ Amortization , Artificial arrangements, Classification of intangibles, Commercial reason, Corporate tax incentives, Decision predominantly in favor of tax authority, District Court, General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), Goodwill, Intangibles - Goodwill Know-how Patents, Ip box, Israel, Labels, Local anti avoidance, Non-legitimate tax planning, Non-Recognition and Recharacterisation, reclassification of income, Research and development (R&D), Royalty, Royalty and License Payments, Sale of the trademark, Tax Avoidance Schemes, Tax Planning (Aggressive), Trademark
While living in France, Israel Daniel Amram (IDA) devised an idea for the development of a unique and efficient computerized interface that would link insurance companies and physicians and facilitate financial accounting between medical service providers and patients. IDA registered the trademark “SEPHIRA” and formed a company in France under the name SAS SEPHIRA . IDA then moved to Israel and formed Sephira & Offek Ltd. Going forward the company in Israel would provid R&D services to SAS SEPHIRA in France. All of the taxable profits in Israel was labled as “R&D income” which is taxed at a lower rate in Israel. Later IDA’s rights in the trademark was sold to Sephira & Offek Ltd in return for €8.4m. Due to IDA’s status as a “new Immigrant” in Israel profits from the sale was tax exempt. Following the acquisition of the trademark, Sephira & Offek Ltd licensed the trademark to SAS SEPHIRA in return for royalty payments. In the books ... Read more