Tag: marketing and promotion (AMP)

Local distributor spending on advertising, marketing, and promotion beyond what an independent entity would bear, potentially creating a marketing intangible benefiting the foreign brand owner. Tax authorities typically argue excess AMP constitutes an unremunerated international transaction requiring compensation.

India vs Sony India Pvt. Ltd., August 2025, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Case ITA No.9080/Del/2019, ITA No.1688/Del/2022, and ITA No.2052/Del/2022

India vs Sony India Pvt. Ltd., August 2025, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Case ITA No.9080/Del/2019, ITA No.1688/Del/2022, and ITA No.2052/Del/2022

Sony India faced transfer pricing adjustments across multiple assessment years covering AMP expenses, royalty payments, and advisory services. India's Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that neither the Bright Line Test nor intensity adjustments are permissible benchmarking methods under the Income Tax Act, deleting both AMP and royalty adjustments. The Tribunal also directed revisions to the comparables set for advisory services, deciding the case mostly in Sony's favour ... Read more
India vs Hyundai Motor India Limited, April 2017, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Case I.T.A. No. 853/Chny/2014 and 563/Chny/2015

India vs Hyundai Motor India Limited, April 2017, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Case I.T.A. No. 853/Chny/2014 and 563/Chny/2015

Hyundai Motor India faced transfer pricing adjustments on advertising, marketing and promotional expenses, which tax authorities treated as an international transaction benefiting its Korean parent. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted all adjustments for the years under appeal, finding no written agreement obligating Hyundai Motor India to promote the foreign brand. The expenses were incurred solely for the Indian company's own business and could not constitute an international transaction ... Read more