Canada vs Dow Chemicals, February 2023, Supreme Court, Case No. 40276

Posted on | By Courts of Canada | No comments
Category: Legality - Legitimacy - Constitutional | Tag: , , ,
« | »

In 2022 the Federal Court of Canada ruled in favour of the Revenue Agency and dismissed Dow Chemicals’ appeal regarding the Tax Court’s jurisdiction to make a downward adjustment.

The Federal Court held that the Tax Court could not overturn the Revenue Agency’s (Minister’s) opinion that a requested downward adjustment was inappropriate because the Tax Court’s jurisdiction is only to set aside, vary or remit an assessment to the Minister, whereas an opinion is not an assessment.

According to the Federal Court, the jurisdiction to judicially review an opinion lies with the Federal Court.

Following the Federal Court’s decision, Dow Chemicals filed an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Appellant DCC.pdf
Respondent HMTK.pdf
Appellant DCC.pdf

Judgement of the Supreme Court

In a judgment of 23 February 2023, the application for leave to appeal was granted and the question of jurisdiction will now be considered by the Supreme Court.

 

Related Guidelines

TPG2022 Chapter IV paragraph 4.32 To eliminate double taxation in transfer pricing cases, tax administrations may consider requests for corresponding adjustments as described in paragraph 2 of Article 9. A corresponding adjustment, which in practice may be undertaken as part of the mutual agreement procedure, can mitigate or eliminate double taxation in cases where one...
TPG2022 Chapter V paragraph 5.60 Jurisdictions should require in a timely manner Country-by-Country Reporting from ultimate parent entities of MNE groups resident in their jurisdiction and referred to in Section E.2.2 and exchange this information on an automatic basis with the jurisdictions in which the MNE group operates and which fulfil the conditions listed in...
TPG2022 Chapter IV paragraph 4.14 When transfer pricing issues are present, the divergent rules on burden of proof among OECD member countries will present serious problems if the strict legal rights implied by those rules are used as a guide for appropriate behaviour. For example, consider the case where the controlled transaction under examination involves...
TPG2022 Chapter IV paragraph 4.67 The amount of interest (as distinct from the rate at which it is applied) may also have more to do with the year to which the jurisdiction making the corresponding adjustment attributes the corresponding adjustment. The jurisdiction making the corresponding adjustment may decide to make the adjustment for the year...
TPG2022 Chapter IV paragraph 4.15 Consider the same facts as in the example in the preceding paragraph. If the burden of proof is again guiding behaviour, a taxpayer in the first jurisdiction being a subsidiary of a taxpayer in the second jurisdiction (notwithstanding the burden of proof and these Guidelines), may be unable or unwilling...
TPG2022 Chapter IV paragraph 4.68 Corresponding adjustments are not the only adjustments that may be triggered by a primary transfer pricing adjustment. Primary transfer pricing adjustments and their corresponding adjustments change the allocation of taxable profits of an MNE group for tax purposes but they do not alter the fact that the excess profits represented...
TPG2022 Chapter IV paragraph 4.36 Once a tax administration has agreed to make a corresponding adjustment it is necessary to establish whether the adjustment is to be attributed to the year in which the controlled transactions giving rise to the adjustment took place or to an alternative year, such as the year in which the...
OECD COVID-19 TPG paragraph 30 One potential solution to the uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic would be to allow for the inclusion of price adjustment mechanisms in controlled transactions. This may provide for flexibility while maintaining an arm’s length outcome. In particular, this approach to the extent permissible by domestic law would allow the...
TPG2022 Chapter V paragraph 5.24 The Country-by-Country Report requires aggregate tax jurisdiction-wide information relating to the global allocation of the income, the taxes paid, and certain indicators of the location of economic activity among tax jurisdictions in which the MNE group operates. The report also requires a listing of all the Constituent Entities for which...
TPG2022 Chapter IV paragraph 4.26 Because cross-border transfer pricing issues implicate the tax base of two jurisdictions, an overly harsh penalty system in one jurisdiction may give taxpayers an incentive to overstate taxable income in that jurisdiction contrary to Article 9. If this happens, the penalty system fails in its primary objective to promote compliance...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *