Mexico vs “TP doc-Lawsuit”, June 2019, Supreme Court, Case No. 14039/17-17-10-3/2502/18-PL-07-04

Posted on | By Courts of Mexico | No comments
Category: Legality - Legitimacy - Constitutional, Transfer Pricing Documentation | Tag: , , , , , , , , , ,
« | »

In this case a group of taxpayers filed a lawsuit for the nullity of the new Mexican transfer pricing documentation obligations introduced in 2017 by rules 3.9.11, 3.9.14, 3.9.15, 3.9.16 and 3.9.17 of the First Resolution of Amendments to the Tax Miscellaneous published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, issued by the Head of the Tax Administration Service.

Article 76-A of the Mexican Income Tax Law states that the taxpayers referred to in Article 32-H, Sections I, II, III and IV of the Federal Tax Code who enter into transactions with related parties must provide the tax authorities with annual related party information returns: 1) master file; 2) local file and 3) a country-by-country report. This three tiered documentation package provides the tax authorities with information related to transactions between related parties on transfer pricing, in order to identify conduct that could imply a risk of tax avoidance or evasion, improve the exchange of information with authorities of the same nature at the international level and carry out economic and statistical analyses.

Supreme Court Judgement

The Supreme Court predominantly dismissed the claim of unlawfulness of the Mexican documentation obligations.

Click here for English Translation

Click here for other translation

MEX DOC SC 2019

Related Guidelines

TPG2022 Chapter II Annex I paragraph 1[See Chapter II, Part III, Section B of these Guidelines for general guidance on the application of the transactional net margin method. The assumptions about arm’s length arrangements in the following examples are intended for illustrative purposes only and should not be taken as prescribing adjustments and arm’s length arrangements...
TPG2022 Chapter V paragraph 5.23Annex II to Chapter V of these Guidelines sets out the items of information to be included in the local file....
TPG2022 Chapter IV Annex II paragraph 1Advance Pricing Arrangements (“APAs”) are the subject of extensive discussion in the Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations at Chapter IV, Section F. The development of working arrangements between competent authorities is considered at paragraph 4.175: Between those countries that use APAs, greater uniformity in APA practices...
TPG2022 Chapter V paragraph 5.15It may often be the case that the documents and other information required for a transfer pricing audit will be in the possession of members of the MNE group other than the local affiliate under examination. Often the necessary documents will be located outside the country whose tax administration is...
TPG2022 Chapter V paragraph 5.19The information required in the master file provides a “blueprint” of the MNE group and contains relevant information that can be broken down into five categories: a) the MNE group’s organisational structure; b) a description of the MNE group’s business or businesses; c) the MNE group’s intangibles; d) the MNE...
TPG2022 Chapter V paragraph 5.60Jurisdictions should require in a timely manner Country-by-Country Reporting from ultimate parent entities of MNE groups resident in their jurisdiction and referred to in Section E.2.2 and exchange this information on an automatic basis with the jurisdictions in which the MNE group operates and which fulfil the conditions listed in...
TPG2022 Chapter VIII paragraph 8.52The following information would be relevant and useful concerning the initial terms of the CCA: a) a list of participants b) a list of any other associated enterprises that will be involved with the CCA activity or that are expected to exploit or use the results of the subject activity...
TPG2022 Chapter V paragraph 5.51It is recommended that all MNE groups be required to file the Country-by-Country Report each year except as follows....
TPG2022 Chapter IV paragraph 4.103For purposes of the discussion in this Section, safe harbours do not include administrative simplification measures which do not directly involve determination of arm’s length prices, e.g. simplified, or exemption from, documentation requirements (in the absence of a pricing determination), and procedures whereby a tax administration and a taxpayer agree...
TPG2022 Chapter VI Annex I example 2173. Första is a consumer goods company organised and operating in country A. Prior to Year 1, Första produces Product Y in country A and sells it through affiliated distribution companies in many countries around the world. Product Y is well recognised and attracts a premium compared to its competitors,...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *