On 17 June 2024, additional guidance and lists of qualifying and coverred jurisdictions under Amount B was released by the OECD. The additional guidance includes: The definitions of qualifying jurisdictions within the meaning of section 5.2 and 5.3 of the Amount B guidance. These definitions will facilitate adjustments to the return calculated under the simplified and streamlined approach for tested parties located in those qualifying jurisdictions. The respective definitions are now incorporated into the Amount B guidance in the annex to Chapter IV of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. The definition of covered jurisdictions within scope of the political commitment on Amount B. That political commitment recognises that subject to their domestic legislation and administrative practices, members of the Inclusive Framework commit to respect the outcome determined under the simplified and streamlined approach to in-scope transactions where such an approach is applied by a covered jurisdiction and to take all reasonable steps to relieve potential double taxation that may arise from the ... Read more

On 19 February 2024, the OECD announced the release of the report on Amount B, which provides a simplified and streamlined approach to the application of the arm’s length principle to baseline marketing and distribution activities. The report, which introduces two options for implementation for jurisdictions that opt into the simplified and streamlined approach from January 2025, describes the circumstances under which a distributor is within scope of Amount B including cases where it also performs certain non-distribution activities, such as manufacturing. It also sets out the activities that may exclude a distributor from the scope of the simplified and streamlined approach, such as the distribution of commodities or digital goods. The inclusion of the Amount B guidance into the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines is accompanied by conforming changes to the Commentary on Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention ... Read more

12 July 2023 138 members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework agreed an Outcome Statement recognising the significant progress made and allowing countries and jurisdictions to move forward with historic, major reform of the international tax system. The Two‐Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy will ensure a fairer distribution of profits and taxing rights among countries and jurisdictions with respect to the world’s largest Multinational Enterprises (MNEs). The Outcome Statement agreed at the 15th Meeting of the Inclusive Framework follows 20 months of intense technical negotiations by delegates to continue the work to implement the Two Pillar Solution. It reflects collaboration and compromise among all jurisdictions – small and large, developing and developed – during negotiations by Inclusive Framework members since October 2021. The Outcome Statement summarises the package of deliverables developed by the Inclusive Framework to address the remaining elements of the Two‐Pillar Solution: A text of a Multilateral Convention (MLC) developed ... Read more

The European Commission has proposed a Directive ensuring a minimum effective tax rate for the global activities of large multinational groups. The proposal delivers on the EU’s pledge to move extremely swiftly and be among the first to implement the recent historic global tax reform agreement, which aims to bring fairness, transparency and stability to the international corporate tax framework. The proposed directive follows closely the international agreement and sets out how the principles of the 15% effective tax rate – agreed by 137 countries – will be applied in practice within the EU. It includes a common set of rules on how to calculate this effective tax rate, so that it is properly and consistently applied across the EU. The proposed rules will apply to any large group, both domestic and international, with a parent company or a subsidiary situated in an EU Member State. If the minimum effective rate is not imposed by the country where a low-taxed ... Read more