‘Global Travel Srl’ was an Italian subsidiary of a Spanish multinational group that operated a global IT platform used by travel agencies to book transport and travel services. The Italian company distributed access to the platform to local travel agencies and paid them incentives or bonuses linked to booking volumes. At the same time, the company passed on these incentive costs to its Spanish parent without adding a markup, while paying licence fees to the parent company for the right to sublicense the software separately. For VAT purposes, the incentives paid to travel agencies were treated as taxable services, enabling the company to deduct input VAT.
Following a tax audit for 2016, however, the Italian tax authorities denied the deduction of VAT relating to incentives paid to travel agencies. They argued that these payments did not constitute consideration for a taxable supply of services, but rather constituted mere transfers of money, falling outside the scope of VAT. In the authorities’ view, there was no direct contractual link or synallagmatic relationship between the incentives paid to travel agencies and any taxable service supplied to the taxpayer. Consequently, VAT deducted on these payments was recovered, together with penalties and interest.
The taxpayer challenged the assessment, arguing that the incentives were economically and contractually linked to the services provided by travel agencies, specifically the promotion and use of the group’s booking platform. They argued that the payments formed part of a complex yet coherent business model involving interdependent contracts within the group and with third parties, and that they therefore constituted consideration for taxable services. The taxpayer also relied on a ruling obtained by its Spanish parent company from the Spanish tax authorities, who had recognised the onerous nature of similar services and the deductibility of VAT. As a fallback, the taxpayer requested recognition of a direct right to recover VAT paid to travel agencies in the event that deduction was denied.
Decision
The Tax Court of Appeal upheld the taxpayer’s appeal and overturned the initial judgment.
The court held that the incentives paid to travel agencies were part of a broader contractual framework aimed at promoting and operating the booking platform, and could not be considered gratuitous payments or mere transfers of money. The court found that the tax authorities had adopted an overly formalistic approach by isolating individual cash flows and ignoring the economic reality of the transactions. Consequently, the denial of VAT deduction was unlawful. The court rejected the tax authorities’ reliance on case law concerning end-of-year bonuses that were not linked to specific services, and confirmed that the taxpayer was entitled to deduct the VAT.
Click here for English translation
Click here for other translation