Tag: vGA (verdeckte Gewinnausschüttung)

German tax doctrine treating payments or benefits granted by a corporation to its shareholder that a prudent director would not grant to an unrelated party as constructive profit distributions. Tax authorities apply vGA to recharacterise excessive charges, inflated interest, or royalties, increasing taxable income.

Germany vs B GmbH, October 2018, Bundesfinanzhof, Case No I R 78/16

Germany vs B GmbH, October 2018, Bundesfinanzhof, Case No I R 78/16

A German GmbH formed a provision for a liability claim under §73 AO relating to its parent company's corporation tax debts and sought to deduct the amount. The tax authority disallowed the deduction, treating it as a non-deductible tax expense. The Bundesfinanzhof upheld the authority's position in 2018, ruling the expense constituted a verdeckte Gewinnausschüttung (hidden profit distribution) rather than falling under the §10 No.2 KStG deduction prohibition ... Read more
Germany vs "A Investment GmbH", June 2017, Tax Court , Case no 10 K 771/16

Germany vs “A Investment GmbH”, June 2017, Tax Court , Case no 10 K 771/16

A German holding company financed an acquisition using a shareholder loan at 8% interest, determined via external CUP comparables. The German tax authority challenged the rate, applying the internal bank loan rate of 4.78% instead. The Cologne Tax Court upheld the authority's position in 2017, finding the bank loan a reliable internal CUP and rejecting risk premiums for subordination, given implicit group support under German insolvency law ... Read more
Germany vs "Spedition Gmbh", October 2012, Federal Tax Court 11.10.2012, I R 75/11

Germany vs “Spedition Gmbh”, October 2012, Federal Tax Court 11.10.2012, I R 75/11

A German freight company entered a written agreement at year-end to pay management fees to its Dutch parent for services already received. The German tax authority challenged the arrangement as a hidden distribution of profits due to its retrospective nature. The Federal Tax Court rejected this assessment in 2012, ruling that double tax treaty arm's length provisions address the amount of a transaction, not the reason for or timing of its documentation ... Read more
Germany vs "Trademark GmbH", November 2007, Bundesfinanzhof, Case No I B 7/07

Germany vs “Trademark GmbH”, November 2007, Bundesfinanzhof, Case No I B 7/07

A German subsidiary paid licence fees to its Austrian parent for use of a trademark registered in Austria. The German tax authority treated these royalty payments as hidden profit distributions. The Bundesfinanzhof upheld the tax authority's assessment in 2007, dismissing the taxpayer's appeal and confirming that the payments lacked arm's length justification under German transfer pricing rules ... Read more
Germany vs "Trademark GmbH", November 2006, FG München, Case No 6 K 578/06

Germany vs “Trademark GmbH”, November 2006, FG München, Case No 6 K 578/06

A German subsidiary paid licence fees to its Austrian parent company for use of a registered trademark under a 1992 agreement. The German tax authorities reclassified these royalty payments as hidden profit distributions (vGA). The FG München upheld the tax authority's position in November 2006, finding the licence fees constituted a concealed distribution of profits rather than arm's length remuneration ... Read more
Germany vs "Clothing Distribution Gmbh", October 2001, BFH Urt. 17.10.2001, IR 103/00

Germany vs “Clothing Distribution Gmbh”, October 2001, BFH Urt. 17.10.2001, IR 103/00

A German GmbH distributing clothing for its Italian parent faced hidden profit distribution assessments after sustained losses. The German Federal Tax Court found the tax authority failed to prove deviation from arm's length prices and held that where an arm's length range exists, adjustment must favour the taxpayer, not the median. Losses exceeding three years trigger only a rebuttable presumption of non-arm's length pricing ... Read more